Dracul Modernity And Folklore - 1119 Words

Jake Klimeck Novels and Tales Dracula Modernity and Folklore Dracula, is not just a story of good versus evil, but a story of complex parallels. Count Dracula is not just a living being, but also dead. Dracula is a man, but he is also an animal. Furthermore, Dracula is both beautiful and repulsive. It is these parallels about Dracula that create a sense of anxiety and uncertainty throughout the reading. Stoker s use of parallels throughout the novel creates discontent throughout the whole novel. This discontent, not only revolves around Dracula, but many characters throughout the novel. The uses of the novel s settings helps to create a unique parallel between modernity and folklore. The parallel between modernity and folklore taps into the fears of the novel s earliest Victorian readers and how folklore relates to modern technologies. The parallel between modernity and folklore is accomplished by the hunting of Dracula and the use of both folklore and modern technologies to defeat Dracula. Well the characters refused the â€Å"myths† that surrounded Dracula at first, the characters came to realized that both modern technology and folklore must be used together to defeat Dracula. First, this paper will form the basic concept that will encompass the characters and their beliefs about modern technology and folklore ideologies. Secondly, This paper will investigate how modernity will allow the group to be successful,and how folklore affects their

Six Major Causes Of Wrongful Conviction - 2538 Words

Part1: Six Major Causes of Wrongful Conviction The most vicious cause of wrongful conviction is eyewitness misidentification. According to the Innocence Project, 72% of overturned wrongful convictions through DNA testing were due to eyewitness misidentification1. As this statistics implies, eyewitness identification (Eye-ID) is untrustworthy information. The main reason why Eye-ID lacks accuracy is due to malleability of memories. The Innocence Project asserts there are two variables greatly influence memory and also Eye-ID. One type of variables is â€Å"estimator variables† which are incontrollable factors by the criminal justice system. Examples of estimator variables are environmental factors (e.g., lighting and distance) when the crime occurred, racial factors, and psychological factors (e.g., severity of trauma)1. The other type of variable is â€Å"system variables† which is controllable by the criminal justice system. These variables are within the procedure of attaining evidences. For instance, post-identi fication feedback (e.g., confirming feedback that an eyewitness receives), biased lineup/ photo array composition, biased administrators of lineup can negatively influences Eye-ID. The second primary cause of wrongful conviction is due to unreliable or improper forensic science and forensic misconduct. The Innocence Project asserts that most forensic science (e.g., analysis of hair, bite marks, fire arms, and tool marks) has not been thoroughly and scientifically evaluatedShow MoreRelatedThe Death Penalty Should Be Abolished1132 Words   |  5 PagesUnited States that has the death penalty (Jurisdictions with no recent executions, 2017). Although thirty-one states have a death penalty, executions are rare or non-existing in most states (Jurisdictions with no recent executions, 2015). In 2015, only six states carried out executions (Jurisdictions with no recent executions, 2015). The death penalty has been a topic people argued over since it was first established. Many arguments have been made stating the positive impact from the death penalty, butRead MoreWrongful Convictions And The Criminal Justice System1933 Words   |  8 Pagesthe corrupted side of the c riminal justice system. After analyzing several articles regarding wrongful conviction cases in the Unites States, it is apparent that wrongful conviction cases occur more often than society believed. It has come to surface in recent years that wrongful convictions are a big problem with our criminal justice system. Researchers have discovered the causes of wrongful convictions to be bad lawyering, government misconduct, informants, false confessions, flawed forensic scienceRead MoreThe Innocence Project : A National Litigation Organization1381 Words   |  6 PagesInnocence project was founded by Barry C. Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University in 1992, and became a nonprofit organization in 2004. In addition to our co-directors and a managing attorney, there are six full-time staff attorneys and nearly 300 active cases. As a clinic, the law students handle the casework while being supervised by the team of attorneys and clinic staff. To determine whether or not to represent a case the Innocence Project gathersRead MoreThe American Judicial System1894 Words   |  8 Pageshowever it still has several shortcomings. My general area of research is on the prison system, and more specifically, percentages of the public who are wrongfully incarcerated. The purpose of this research paper is to discuss a few of the leading causes and propose possible reforms that may prove to be effective. Understanding the laws of our country and the reasons they were instated, is integral to success in defending the innocent. That is the ultimate purpose of my conducting this research; toRead MoreWhat ´s Conviction?2375 Words   |  10 Pages INTRODUCTION There is wrongful conviction when a person who is innocent in the charges leveled against him is found guilty of the offenses and as a result have to serve the penalty for it. There is also wrongful conviction when a person who committed a crime is found innocent due to lack of enough evidence to convict the accomplice and as a result the innocent percent person is convicted. In a nutshell conviction is said to be wrong when an innocent person is found guilty and the guilty personRead MoreThe Crime Of The Criminal Justice System Essay2266 Words   |  10 Pagescriminal justice system is not even close to perfect. It has many flaws, some of which are: police brutality, death penalty, mass incarceration, gun violence, and especially wrongful convictions. A majority of the flaws that the system has can be easily fixed and can be set straight. For example, the issue of wrongful convictions has been relevant for quite some time and has the potential to decrease its probability of occu rring by focusing on the importance of scientific evidence, rid of faulty witnessRead MoreEyewitness Evidence And The Innocence Project3722 Words   |  15 PagesAs research shows, eyewitness misidentification is the single greatest cause of wrongful convictions nationwide, playing a role in 72% of convictions overturned through DNA testing. In this paper, I am going to revisit two cases that were affected by this striking procedure of eyewitness misidentification, efforts currently being made to address this problem, and my personal recommendations to minimize cases surrounding the topic illustrated in this paper. Although eyewitness testimony can be significantRead MoreMistaken Eyewitness Identification And The Criminal Justice Center951 Words   |  4 Pageshas become a huge complication in the United States, because of the difficulties that follow it. Mistaken eyewitness identification has been the leading contributing factors to wrongful convictions. (The Innocence Project) With the help of DNA testing, more than 70% of convictions were overturned. There have been several major research programs and centers that have been actively pursuing new, accurate methods that help to arrest and convict a suspect. The Robert Presley Crime and Justice Center isRead MoreThe American Criminal Justice System1398 Words   |  6 Pageswhich takes place here in our very own school. property crimes, which include burglary, theft, arson, as well as the above larceny. But the most common felony which accounts for more than two million violations annually. The war on drugs has been a major factor in the prison population since early 1971. People believe that the reason drugs are illegal is because of medical research and statistics that drugs are unhealthy. If that were true then why aren’t tobacco products outlawed? The reasoning behindRead MoreArguments For and Against the Reintroduction of the Death Penalty for Murder1276 Words   |  6 Pagesnot leave the condemned in minutes of agony. Although the reintroduction of the death penalty for murder may well result in some wrongful executions Pawsey argued that it was justifiable if the number of innocent lives saved by capital punishment was greater than the number lost through wrongful conviction and execution. (Sorell, 1987: 47) The Just Deserts theory is inflicting pain on the offender proportional to his offence. (Sorell 1987

Connections Between Components Comprises †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Connections Between Components Comprises? Answer: Introduction Systems thinking is a discipline in management that is specifically concerned with the inherent comprehension and examination of connections between components that comprises a particular process. According to Weinberg (2011), systems thinking is an important concept in project management, quality and portfolio management, improving business processes and ensuring organisational maturity. Besides, Gharajedaghi (2011) defines systems thinking as the inherent ability to develop reliable insinuations about particular actions by establishing a progressively deep understanding of the fundamental structures. Through system thinking, innovative conception of facts can be stimulated opening up new possibilities, help in the identification and management of various risks and enhance communication. Moreover, the research by Leveson (2011) clearly stipulates that system thinking can effectively facilitate faster response to diverse changes during project execution as it can significantly improv e organisational leadership skills by raising awareness of various project objectives. Therefore, this research gives coherent exploration of relevant literatures on the concepts of systems thinking and how such relates to project, program and portfolio management. The research further identifies different tools of systems thinking, and will include the management of risks, value and systems engineering. Correspondingly, assorted forms of systems thinking that are important in project and portfolio management are discussed, and include, organizational forms, models, system engineering, and value and risk management. An explanation of the systems thinking approaches and a comparisons with the traditional methods is also given.; Significance of systems thinking to a project and an organisation According to Flood (2010), the application of systems thinking in project managements is becoming more paramount in most organisations. The research by Gharajedaghi (2011) point at the inherent need for increased transparency and comprehensive understanding of how diverse elements of systems thinking influences project management among other organizational facets. The underlying principles applicable here include the ability to develop quality thinking when solving various problems, increased candidness and identification of defective solutions. According to Weinberg (2011), some of the traditional approaches to project management majorly revolves around defusing complex elements of a project through accurate planning and establishing more control over the associated processes. However, such traditional approaches have limited influence on project management given that there are numerous arising issues that may occasionally necessitate critical thinking. Given the dynamic environments in which modern organizations operates in, project management is increasingly becoming a hard task. As such, by the research by Leveson (2011) perceive systems thinking as the most viable solution to the present and future challenges that relates to project management. To understand the significance of systems thinking, we must first understand the problem-solving processes in the context of project management. In their research, Best and Holmes (2010) further explains that problem-solving in an organization involve the precise identification of challenges that may interfere with the status quo. These challenges must be identified and properly understood by the decision-makers. Once the problems have been identified, systems thinking will enable an organization to adopt a holistic approach to problem solving. Such approaches include the determination of various opinions and techniques of thinking and how the status quo affects project implementation (Flood, 2010). Such holistic approaches include the identification of facts and related events, examining the subtle aspects of the identified challenges and developing instructive and characteristic reactions to the complex project dynamics (Kerzner, 2013). Another importance of systems thinking is that it enables an organization to clearly appreciate the cause-and-effect processes that are related to a particular phenomenon. This facilitates the establishment of network of interactions during project implementation based on an understanding of how problems can be connected to become complex organizational issues. According to by Leveson (2011) feedback loops are used in understanding variables that can influence project execution and interactions between such variables. The recapitulating patterns identified in the feedback loop can be used in the documentation of possible reasons for the complex problems. According to Leveson (2011), systems thinking is also instrumental in planning scenarios and modelling actions that simplifies the incorporation of diverse viewpoints. Such an approach to systems thinking majorly assumes that an organization relishes in relevant project information which can be used to solve arising challenges. Correspondingly, the research by Mingers and White (2010) clearly stipulates that systems thinking in project management can be used in the determination of specified behaviours and team approaches to project implementation. According to Nguyen et al. (2011), such approaches to systems thinking necessitates a higher level of adaptation to possible modifications to the present circumstances. For example, adapting to new technological innovations and increased level of knowledge sharing as some of the social processes that must be considered. As such, Best and Holmes (2010) further point that the project team must be more open and agile in the management of related activities. Besides, an organizational culture should be based on constant transformations in various aspects of the organisation that my limit the ability of the project team to adapt. The table below indicates alternative approaches and comparisons towards project management. Approaches Traditional approach Agile approach Systems thinking approach Comparisons Project solving and goals Gives a comprehensive delineation of project objectives based on the SMART model Such definition of project objectives is based on the strict examination of the diverse project requirements Gives a general explanation of concepts and possible outcome of the project The primary objective of the project team is to avail various project values to the clients Assumes an all-inclusive or holistic approach to solving related problems Gives a comprehensive definition of a project based on varied perceptions Gives a clear representation of project objectives among other phases of a project Project management cycle Assumes a linear cycle in project management that include clear explanation of various phases the project Project planning is strictly based on exhaustive timeframes which forms the basis of project management Assumes an iterative project management cycle that stresses on the delivery of functional elements Explains how organizations can adapt to changing situations Offers a close interaction with project beneficiaries such as clients Project executions processes are significantly simplified Assumes a non-linear cycle in project management that is majorly based on a cause-effect relationship in complex project setting Enables the examination of collaboration between various project elements Facilitates the development of potential substitute project scenarios Offers the project team an opportunity to adapt and manage changes in a dynamic project environment Organisational aspects A Work Breakdown Structure defines the organisational structure Project is highly formalized Majorly focuses on establishing a balance especially between fundamental project limitations such as cost and quality constraints Simplified organizations structures Majorly focuses on organizational flexibility, efficiency and adaptability Organizational structures moderately formalized Flexible, efficient and functional organizational structure Facilitates the development and adaptability to dynamic or complex project settings A highly competent project team Project team The oject team comprise of a narrow group of specialists The project team depicts high level of competency and experience Integrative (democratic) style of leadership is depicted The management style is majorly task-oriented The project teams are self-disciplined and organized The team comprises of a competent group of professionals Higher level of cooperation especially in decision making Increased communication especially among the project team members Incorporating project clients in the creation of final value The leadership and management styles stresses on cooperation and directing other team members. The project team comprise of a various interdisciplinary groups Project challenges are holistically examined The primary assumption is that the identified project problem is more complex than earlier anticipated The deciphering of the identified project problems based on the stipulated cause-and-effect relations in a complex project situation Encourages the sharing of thoughts on project implementation Stresses on the application of creative thinking to solve the identified problems The style of leadership common here is democratic that encourages project team members to freely participate in the process. Therefore, from the above comparisons, it is clear that systems thinking can complement other approaches to project management. Tools and techniques of systems thinking According to Davis et al. (2014), systems thinking tools are instrumental in facilitating the generation and organization of situations during project management. Some of the tools and techniques that comprise systems thinking include risk management, value and systems engineering. According to Senge (2014), systems engineering refers to the processes of designing and managing dynamic systems in the life cycle of a project. It include the ability to accurately test and evaluate, design and implement complex projects. Specifically, in this context, systems engineering deals with various project-related processes and aim at reducing the possible need for re-planning and optimization of the identified risk margin (Conti, 2010). Correspondingly, risk management refers to the processes involved in the assessment and elimination project risks. It includes increasing performances to ensure an iterative management of perceived project risks. According to Underwood and Waterson (2014), systems engineering also enable organizations to liaise and co-ordinate with pertinent bodies and other facets of project implementation. The figure below shows a functional systems engineering process. How systems thinking influences organisational structures, forms and business cultures According to Barile and Saviano (2011), systems thinking introduces a new insight on organisational structures, forms and business cultures. This is because it encourages a comprehensive and different look at organizational problems, and encourages the project team to freely interact and share important information. Systems thinking is also important in addressing various organizational challenges such as fragmentation and inadequate sharing of information among various departments (Caldwell, 2012). Specifically, systems thinking introduces a culture of cohesiveness and increased ability to handle complex systems based on a unique and all-inclusive learning process. ; How systems thinking influences Portfolio alignment and portfolio management process cycle Essentially, portfolio management focuses on the introduction of relevant change initiatives to a management system. As such, systems thinking facilitates the coordination and alignment of strategic business planning and corporate governance among other important functions to attain effective alignment of organizational portfolio (Caldwell, 2012). This ensure the creation of structures that can coordinate project activities and successfully deliver strategic project objectives. In essence, portfolio management as a form of systems thinking stresses on the prioritization of such processes that can result in the best possible outcome. This will enable an organization to avoid duplicating projects and initiating initiatives that can help in attaining the stipulate organizational objectives. How systems thinking influences business value model According to Conti (2010) business value model is an important form of systems thinking that can help an organization to better understand its problems that should be solved. This model assess such values that can drive customer satisfaction and possible limitations that can affect a business desire to establish relevant solutions. By establishing a business value model, an organization can be able to create a shared ideas and align the project team members to attain organizational objectives (Kerzner, 2013). How systems thinking influences organisational maturity Every company is pursuing absolute maturity in project management and implementation. Thus, systems thinking are seen as important factor in the successful implementation of organizational objectives. According to Barile and Saviano (2011), maturity in organizational setup aim at attaining near perfect development of organizational abilities. The company established that weak supply chain systems was a significant barrier to its market performances. The barrier meant that Costco would not adequately meet the growing demand of its organic food products among its customer bases. As such, they introduced a systems thinking model that focused on acquiring more organic food suppliers. This increased their capital prowess and improved their relationship with the customers. Thus, the company is guaranteed of organic food supplies and a positive return on its investments and increased value to customers.; Conclusions Indeed, systems thinking is a very powerful problem solving tool and technique especially in complex project situations (Caldwell, 2012). Notably, the research has clearly specified different literature, theories and how systems thinking can be applied in project management. Through system project, the research ascertains that an organization solve challenges related to project execution through a comprehensive perspective that acknowledges various systems and components constantly interacting during a particular process. Notably, systems thinking the management of an organization can significantly improve given the amplified level of information provided. This is because systems thinking encourages organizational management to approach issues through first assessing the perceived impacts and consequences of their resolutions. Such analyses will further help an organization to use systems thinking to generate alternative solutions to diverse issues arising in project and portfolio management (Kerzner, 2013). Furthermore, systems thinking encourages the formulation of optimal decisions and solutions that can benefit an organization in its entirety. Thus, the importance of systems thinking in project and portfolio management cannot be ignored whatsoever. The case study of Costco depicts a classic application systems thinking to increase organizational competence and customer value. References Barile, S. and Saviano, M. (2011) Foundations of systems thinking: the structure-system paradigm Best, A. and Holmes, B. (2010) Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods, Evidence Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice,6(2), pp.145-159. Caldwell, R. (2012) Systems thinking, organizational change and agency: A practice theory critique of Senge's Learning Organization, Journal of Change Management,12(2), pp.145-164. Conti, T. (2010) Systems thinking in quality management, The TQM Journal,22(4), pp.352-368. Davis, M.C., Challenger, R., Jayewardene, D.N. and Clegg, C.W. (2014) Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: A call for bravery, Applied ergonomics,45(2), pp.171-180. Flood, R.L. (2010) The relationship of systems thinkingto action research, Systemic Practice and Action Research,23(4), pp.269-284. Gharajedaghi, J. (2011) Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity: A platform for designing business architecture. Elsevier. Kerzner, H. (2013) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Leveson, N. (2011) Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. MIT press. Leveson, N.G. (2011) Applying systems thinking to analyse and learn from events, Safety Science,49(1), pp.55-64. Mingers, J. and White, L. (2010) A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science, European Journal of Operational Research,207(3), pp.1147-1161. Nguyen, N.C., Bosch, O.J. and Maani, K.E. (2011) Creating learning laboratories for sustainable development in biospheres: a systems thinking approach, Systems Research and Behavioral Science,28(1), pp.51-62. Schiuma, G., Carlucci, D. and Sole, F. (2012) Applying a systems thinking framework to assess knowledge assets dynamics for business performance improvement, Expert Systems with Applications,39(9), pp.8044-8050. Senge, P.M. (2014) The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. Crown Business. Underwood, P. and Waterson, P. (2014) Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models, Accident Analysis Prevention,68, pp.75-94. Weinberg, G.M. (2011) An introduction to general systems thinking. New York: Wiley.

Making assignment writing efficient through smartphone apps - Technological advancements have transformed

Technological advancements have transformed the lives of every individual throughout the world because it has made innovation possible in countless ways. In every field and industry, technology has become an essential part of the process without which no economic agent can survive. Technological advancements can include any equipment, process or invention that boosts productivity and makes life easier including but not limited to construction machinery, agricultural processes, gadgets like laptops and tablet PCs, software and smartphone apps. Without such advancements, world would not have been such a great place to live in. Education sector is a prominent industry that transformed the ways teachers teach and students learn. Efficient learning has been made possible because of these technological advancements and students claim that they are able to learn relatively faster than before when I used to write my assignment during college due to the improved methods and inventions. Professors also find it easier to deliver their content to hundreds of students altogether using technology and they also agree to the fact that technology is required in the education sector to maximize efficiency in learning. Why would efficient methods of doing an assignment help you as a student in the first place? Following are some of the most common reasons that students suggest: Gives them more time: One of the major struggles of college students is the scarcity of time due to which they panic at the eleventh hour when deadlines are near. Therefore, they try all the possible ways that can allow them more time to spend on assignments and essays assigned to them. One of the ways is by making assignment writing effective due to which you will be able to complete the given tasks on time and spend the saved time on other tasks. So they need to become efficient in the writing process. Avoid missing deadlines: Another reason is that students often tend to miss deadlines either because they forget to submit the task or omit it on purpose as they are not able to complete it. Using technological ways of doing an assignment can avoid you from facing any such issues and you will not miss deadlines again. Accuracy and convenience: The third reason that students state for why technological advancements are a blessing is that it makes assignment writing very convenient for them. Also, human error is possible when proofreading content but accuracy can be achieved using the help of technology. With these avoidances, students believe that they should adopt every possible strategy that makes assignment writing efficient. Following are some of the best smartphone apps that can help you complete your assignments in the most efficient manner: Documents on iOS: If you are an Apple user, this app can be of great use for you because students usually need to save a lot of files on dropbox and other cloud drives. Extracting them again and again from their locations is quite inconvenient and may take up a lot of your time so Documents can compile and save them in one place. You can then conveniently access each file from one place instead of opening every location where that file was originally saved. Also, the app is available for free! Wunderlist making lives easier: There are very few apps that fulfill a number of requirements of the students and Wunderlist is one of them. Available on Android, iOS, OS X and Windows, Wunderlist allows students to create multiple lists of tasks, set as many reminders as they want and connect their account with other Wunderlist users to collaborate with them on any projects. This kind of a multitasking app is very useful to become efficient as you can set deadline reminders for assignment, plan the assignment and discuss with group members all at one place with convenience. Wolfram Alpha the most popular? A survey revealed that a majority of students use Wolfram Alpha for various purposes. From math geeks to scientists and music lovers, Wolfram alpha is a complete source of exploration where you can find solution to almost every academic problem. It is usually required to solve mathematical problems because it reveals complete step-by-step solutions and is also used to extract statistical data by Economists.The best part about Wolfram Alpha is that despite being so useful and resourceful, students can download it for free on iOS and Android operating system both. It had been very convenient at times when I used to write my assignment because I used to get a lot of information and statistical data from Wolfram Alpha. RefMe is the revolutionized way of citing books: Despite the fact that majority of students prefer conducting research online and using e-books, there are instances when books have to be used. Since citing sources is important, students can do that in the desired style automatically using online tools but when it comes to books, RefMe can help. By just scanning the bar code using phone’s camera, it can cite the book for you in whatever citation style you want. Again, the app is free and is available for a vast majority using either iOS or Android phones. Scanner Pro for advanced level students: There is a frequent need to scan papers for various purposes and Scanner Pro is exactly what students need at that time. Available only for iPhone users, Scanner Pro allows conversion of picture taken from camera to be converted to PDF or JPEG instantly. The final result is so accurate that it is impossible to tell if a real scanner has been used or not. However, you will have to buy the app but the benefits are worth paying for if you are one of those who need to save or send scanned documents on urgent basis quite frequently. With these apps, you can easily make your assignment writing process efficient and ensure that you ace every assignment and follow the deadlines.